The Woman in Black

Arthur Kipps (Radcliffe) in The Woman in Black Hammer Horror’s latest film is a major success and a brilliant genre film that provides enough chills to satisfy genre fans.

Recently widowed lawyer Arthur Kipps (Radcliffe) reluctantly leaves his young son in London when his law firm demands that he head to a remote village in the north of England where the decaying Eel Marsh House resides and deal with the will of the recently deceased Mrs. Drablow. When he gets there he encounters hostile and superstitious locals living in fear of some threat that seems to be connected to a mysterious woman in black. Soon he suffers terrifying visions and begins to uncover a dark story connected to the house and its former residents.

A Cluttered Room in The Woman in Black After a string of films set in modern times like “Let Me In”, Hammer Horror has returned to its roots with an old fashioned tale involving gothic houses, superstitious rustic locals and supernatural threats.

The film is based on a highly successful book by the writer Susan Hill (my mother is a major fan so she must be good). It has been quite influential as it has spawned a television series and a long-running stage play in London’s West End. Jane Goldman, who adapted Kick Ass and Star Dust, works her magic here by changing elements of the book and making it more cinematic according to my mother.

In any case what impressed me most about the film was that it hit all of its genre marks with aplomb. Although there is nothing new in terms of scares what is here is expertly done. The atmosphere and tension are thickly built up from incidental details like ads for a séance sponsored by famous authors to the rarity of telephones and cars. Scenes take place rooms cluttered with creepy Victorian toys and in atmospheric locations like the foggy London streets to the wild north with its cold external locations to the dust choked Eel Marsh House which is a mysterious and evocative rambling ruin where ghosts can pop up and disappear.

Eel Marsh House in The Woman in Black Direction is patient and the audience is allowed to drink in scenes. There are many long-takes where ghosts will pop up in and out of shot, sudden jump-cuts to terrifying images, sound design that highlights the cavernous nature of the house, the growing supernatural threat and the dislocation that mist can cause.

Plunged into this environment is Radcliffe who finds himself chasing shadows. Having ignored the Harry Potter franchise I had little idea of Radcliffe’s acting skills but he managed to play the emotionally shell-shocked Kipps very well.

Arthur Kipps (Radcliffe) in The Woman in BlackAlthough he looks a little young for the role he conveys a sort of enervated presence and I felt he was convincing. Equally convincing were his belief in the supernatural and the motivation that roots him to a house most sane people would stay away from. Also strong are the supporting cast which includes Ciaran Hinds and Janet McTeer.

While the ending came as little surprise for this horror vet I appreciated the atmosphere and execution, the detail and the acting. So far 2011/12 has been excellent for British film and it is great to see Hammer Horror back at its best. This is the first horror film of the year for me so far and I find it hard to believe that it can be topped. That’s a challenge to film distributors.

5/5

The Woman in Black

Release Date: 10th February 2012 (UK)

Running Time: 95 mins.

Director: James Watkins

Writer: Susan Hill (original novel), Jane Goldman (screenplay)

Starring: Daniel Radcliffe, Ciaran Hinds, Janet McTeer, Shaun Dooley

7 thoughts on “The Woman in Black

  1. I got to see ‘Woman In Black’ last week too – don’t you think this is an EXCELLENT horror film for the cinema (in comparison to the vast majority, which are no different if you see them lounging on the sofa in the comfort of your home)? It’s such a classic and atmospheric style, it seems like it really deserves that massive screen and booming surround sound. Not to mention, it scared the pants off of me (there was a hilarious moment where my cinema companion accidently screamed at the top of her lungs: the teenagers nearby could not have been more terrified)!

    I agree with you a great deal, only I wasn’t entirely convinced by Dan Radcliffe. Maybe it’s the Potter phenomenon as you say, but I couldn’t completely believe in him. I don’t want to say “dead behind the eyes” (partly because he comes across as a genuinely hardworking, nice guy), but there’s only so much acting talent that can come through from spending most of your time covered in mud and looking a bit scared. I actually do feel mean now. Scratch what I said about him, he was fine, it was a horror film and he did well.

    If you do like your horror classic and “scary” (I tend to veer towards the gory, and as a result, despite loving the spooky ones, am a total wimp), I agree wholeheartedly that this really is a great cinema night-out. All the horror cliches are here (spooky houses, graveyards, creepy children, dolls… the list goes on); it’s the perfect round-the-campfire classic.

    1. I wholly endorse everything you have said. It feeds off the audience reactions and the big screen does justice to the visuals. It allows Watkins to play his ghost tricks very effectively – the mere sight of the eponymous woman was enough to send shivers up and down the spine.

      As a horror vet I could see where the film was going but that didn’t stop it from being an enjoyable ride and I’m glad it’s dominating the UK chart.

  2. This is probably my most anticipated horror movies this year, or, ever be haha. I’m surprised that it’s such a big hit. I’m going to check it out, interesting enough to know Radcliffe’s performance after HP and also after reading your review.

  3. Pingback: Coming Soon (and the Weekly Bulletin)… « The 360° Review

  4. Nice review – don’t know how I missed it! I will have to watch this but I confess I find it difficult to see Radcliffe as anything but Potter – it kind of puts me off Horns too. Not that I don’t like him – just that he’s Harry Potter!
    Lynn 😀

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.